Home ยป Articles ยป Six Months on a Planet in Crisis: Greta Thunberg’s Travel Diary from the U.S. to Davos

Six Months on a Planet in Crisis: Greta Thunberg’s Travel Diary from the U.S. to Davos

Thunberg arrives in New York City after a 15-day journey crossing the Atlantic on Aug. 28, 2019. Photo: Greta Thunberg

By Greta Thunberg July 10, 2020
Thunberg is a Swedish climate activist and co-founder of the Fridays for Future movement. In December 2019, she was announced as 
TIME’s Person of the Year.

From the original first time published in its entirety in The TIMES;
this essay is adapted from the transcript of a radio program produced for Swedish Radio and broadcast in June.

Afterwards I take the metro to Tenleytown and walk the 45 minute stroll to the house weโ€™ve borrowed. The walk stretches through some of the most beautiful neighbourhoods you can possibly imagine. Every house is like a miniature castle straight out of a fairytale. Outside one of the biggest houses thereโ€™s a woman standing with her daughter, who is around the age of five. โ€œItโ€™s you!โ€ the mother says when she sees me. โ€œCan I take a picture of you together with my daughter?โ€

โ€œOf course!โ€ I answer.

When I walk away she turns facing the girl. โ€œGreta is a climate activist, she explains. Maybe youโ€™ll also become an activist when you grow up.โ€ The mother says it in a way that makes climate activist appear as the most noble, cool thing in the world.

Like a mix between a ballerina, a president, and an astronaut.

Chapter 3: The science

My message is โ€“ and has always been โ€“ listen to the science, listen to the scientists.

โ€œWhich scientists?โ€ you could of course argue. Within all scientific fields thereโ€™s a constant and never-ending debate. Thatโ€™s what science is about. And climate crisis deniers and delayers love this angle. To spread doubt about whether thereโ€™s actually consensus on the scientific grounds of the climate crisis.

That argument can be used in almost all other issues, but itโ€™s no longer possible to use here. The time for that has passed. The consensus is overwhelming. The debate around the global adoption and acceptance of the Paris Agreement and the IPCC reports is over. So what do those two things actually mean?

In Paris, the worldโ€™s governments committed themselves to keeping the global temperature rise to โ€œwell below 2ยฐCโ€. But in the latest update from the IPCC โ€“ the SR1.5 report โ€“ scientists underline that 2ยฐC is not a safe level. We have today already passed about 1.2ยฐC of global heating, and in their report they instead stress the importance of limiting the warming to below 1.5ยฐC. And that is to give us the best possible chance to avoid passing so-called tipping points, and start irreversible chain reactions beyond human control.

So where do we start? Well Iโ€™d suggest that we do precisely what all the worldโ€™s governments have committed to do in the Paris Agreement. Which is to follow the current best available science.

And that, among other places, we find on page 108, chapter 2 in the IPCCโ€™s SR1.5 report. Right there it says that on Jan. 1 2018 we had 420 Gt CO2 left to emit globally to have a 66% chance of staying below the 1.5ยฐ target. We emit about 42 Gt CO2 every year, including land use such as forestry and agriculture. So today weโ€™re soon already down to lower than 300 Gt of CO2 left to emit.

That is the equivalent of less than 7.5 years of todayโ€™s โ€˜business as usualโ€™ emissions until that budget completely runs out. This is the carbon budget which gives us the best odds to achieve the 1.5ยฐ target. Yes, you heard it right, less than 7.5 years.

Do you remember the London Olympics? โ€˜Gangnam Styleโ€™ or the first Hunger Games movie? Those things all happened about seven or eight years ago. Thatโ€™s the amount of time we are talking about.

But even these figures are very watered down. They include almost no tipping points or feedback loops, nor the global aspect of equity in the Paris Agreement, nor already locked-in warming hidden by toxic air pollution. Most IPCC scenarios also assume that future generations will be able to suck hundreds of billions of tonnes of CO2 out of the atmosphere with technologies that donโ€™t exist on the scale required, and that very likely never will in time.

I will try to explain more about what these aspects mean later on. But if you read between the lines you realise that we are facing the need to make changes which are unprecedented in human history.

One reason why the climate and ecological crisis is so hard to communicate is that thereโ€™s no magical date when everything is beyond saving. You cannot predict how many peopleโ€™s lives will be lost, or exactly how our societies will be affected. There are of course countless estimations and calculations which predict what could happenโ€”one more catastrophic than the otherโ€”but they almost exclusively focus on a very limited area and almost never take into account the whole picture. We therefore must learn to read between the lines. Just like in any other emergency.

But these are at least the basics. Even if these figures are way too generous they are still the most reliable roadmap available today. They are what we should be referring to.

And the fact that the responsibility to communicate them falls on me and other children should be seen for exactly what it is โ€“ a failure beyond all imagination.

Chapter 4: Roadtrip

Three days after my speech in the UN I leave New York City. The last few days everything got a bit too much with all the people and the attention. It feels like a huge relief to move out of the house on the Upper West Side of Manhattan and say goodbye to our host for the last month.

Iโ€™ve taken a sabbatical year from school to be able to travel to Santiago de Chile, where the UNโ€™s yearly climate conference, the COP 25, is going to be held. I have no idea how to get there, all I know is that, in order to reach Santiago in time, Iโ€™ve got to get to Los Angeles by November 1st. So now awaits 5 weeks of constant traveling. My dad and I leave Manhattan behind us and drive north in an electric car that weโ€™ve borrowed from Arnold Schwarzenegger.

We travel through spectacular landscapes, past mountains, ravines, glaciers, prairies, deserts, swamps. We see the autumn coloured leaves of New England, the forests of Quebec, the lakes in Minnesota, buffalo herds in Wyoming, the redwood trees in Oregon, red rock formations in Arizona and the cotton fields of Alabama.

We switch between the radio stations. The choices are almost only Christian pop and country music. Most of the time itโ€™s just the two of us, but sometimes we are accompanied by journalists or people we know.

Traveling through Wyoming in Oct. 2019. Photo: Greta Thunberg

Every Friday I continue to strike wherever I find myself to be at that moment. Denver, Iowa City, Charlotte, Rapid City, Edmonton, Vancouver, Los Angeles. Everywhere lots of people show up, people of all ages. But nothing beats Montreal where half a million people came out on the streets.

In South Dakota we are stopped by a policeman. He looks just like a caricature from an American movie, with mirrored shades, cowboy hat and all. He asks us where we are going. I say Santiago. Then he asks if weโ€™ve got any large amounts of โ€œdollars, weapons or dead bodies in the car?โ€ We answer no, and continue across the Missouri river, over the prairies, the Badlands and the Rocky Mountains.

While the car is charging we walk around the alleys of small towns, shopping malls, suburbs, petrol stations, farms, industrial and residential areas. Wherever I go, people come up to talk and take selfies.

We wake up at 7 a.m. and drive until we get tired in the evening. We buy food wherever thereโ€™s food to buy, but itโ€™s not that easy when youโ€™re on the road and youโ€™re vegan. It ends up being mostly canned food, beans, french fries, bananas and bread.

During the nights we either sleep in motels or with people who open up their homes. Activists, scientists, authors, doctors, journalists, hippies, diplomats, movie stars, lawyers. We travel through 37 states in total. Every state has got a slogan on the carsโ€™ license plates, but I make up my own. Like for instance:

North Carolina: Where not even the vegetarian salad bars have vegetarian options.

Alabama: Where the sunsets are pretty and the Christmas decorations are early.

Through the car window I can see the neverending coal trains in Nebraska and Montana, the oil wells in Colorado and California, abandoned factories in Indiana and Pennsylvania, 16-lane highways, endless parking lots and shopping malls, shopping malls, shopping malls. Through the tiny vents of big livestock trucks I look into the eyes of cows and pigs on their way to slaughterhouses.

Iโ€™m stunned by the economic differences and social injustices which in many ways are an affront to all forms of human decency. Iโ€™m outraged by the oppression targeting especially indigenous, Black and Hispanic communities.

Every twenty minutes or so we pass fields where seemingly endless amounts of brand new RVs, motorboats, quad bikes and tractors are lined up for sale. Along the highways you see giant billboards with anti-abortion, anti-evolution and anti-science campaigns.

At night time the sky is lit by countless oil refineries sparkling in the dark, from north to south, from coast to coast.

Apart from a few wind power plants and solar panels there are no signs whatsoever of any sustainable transition, despite this being the richest country in the world. The debate is far behind Europe. Weโ€™re discussing free public transport and circular economy โ€“ here they donโ€™t even have public health care or pavements for pedestrians to walk on.

In a petrol station in Texas I count to over 40 different kinds of coffee. I try to add up the number of different sorts of soft drinks as well, but I lose count around 200.

An older man in a cowboy hat comes up to me.

โ€œIโ€™m a big fan,โ€ he says, before he walks across the parking lot, steps inside his giant pickup truck and drives on down the highway.

Chapter 5: The beetle

The only place that anyone has ever discouraged me from visiting is Alberta, Canada. The state of Alberta is one of the western worldโ€™s largest oil producers and its main claim to fame is probably being home to the tar sands. The tar sands are an area bigger than the whole of England where oil companies have spent the last 60 years extracting oil straight from the soil. A process with a enormous ecological footprint.

Alberta has a very powerful and highly criticized oil lobby that is well known for its harsh methods to silence anyone they consider a threat to their industry. And Iโ€™m definitely considered a threat to them. On several occasions I need to call for police protection when the level of threats and the sheer harassments become too serious.

Thunberg visits Grand Teton National Park in Wyoming, Oct. 2019. Photo: Greta Thunberg

On the morning of Oct.21 Iโ€™m traveling through the spectacular Canadian landscapes with a film crew from the BBC, heading for the Jasper National Park. Magnificent pine forests stretching out as far as the eye can see. It reminds me of home. Except for the fact that many trees here arenโ€™t green, their needles are either brown or have been lost entirely. It looks very strange. I assume they must be American larch trees, since those trees lose their needles in the autumn.

โ€œNo, unfortunately those arenโ€™t Larch trees,โ€ says the biologist Brenda Shepherd as she walks me round the national park. She shakes her head as she approaches one of the brown, pine trees and points to a hole through the bark. Though the hole seeps something that looks like solidified resin.

โ€œHere you can see how the tree has tried to defend itself,โ€ she says. โ€œBut itโ€™s useless, it will soon be dead.โ€

How many trees in this area would you say are affected? I ask.

โ€œAbout 50%.โ€

I canโ€™t seem to get my head around what she just said. โ€œ50%?โ€

โ€œSomewhere around there,โ€ she says.

The term โ€tipping pointโ€ can be hard to understand but this the most clear and obvious example that I that I have come across myself. The mountain pine beetle exists across the North American continent. Every winter the temperature here drops to very low levels. Much colder than in Sweden, for instance. And since only a very small percentage of this species survives in that temperature for a certain number of days, this has never been a problem in the past. But in the last few decades this area has seen a significant level of heating. Canada โ€“ as well as other countries close to the poles โ€“ has seen a rate of warming about twice as fast as the rest of the world.

So, the temperature rises and all of a sudden we find ourselves on the other side of an invisible border. Suddenly almost the entire population of this beetle survives the winter. And we have passed a tipping point. A point of no return which releases several so-called feedback loops: self-reinforcing, often irreversible, chain reactions. And since the local ecosystem completely lacks the ability to adjust to the new reality, the consequences become extremely visible.

Tree after tree is attacked by the mountain pine beetle and dies shortly thereafter.

Needles to say, the effects on the local environment are disastrous.

But, unfortunately, what happens in the Canadian Rockies doesnโ€™t stay in the Canadian Rockies. These mechanisms are global.

Chapter 6: Tipping points

The day after my encounter with the mountain pine beetle, we have an appointment with the glaciologist John Pomeroy. His team of researchers from the University of Saskatchewan has offered to bring me up onto the Athabasca glacier.

Along the walk leading up to the glacier there are signs placed out by the side of the pathway. Every sign marks a certain year. John stops and points at one that says 1982. โ€œThat means that this is where the glacier began in that year.โ€

It looks quite strange as there is no sight of any nearby glacier whatsoever.

โ€œIt was around that time I started working here,โ€ he continues. โ€œSince then I have watched with my own eyes how the glacier has disappeared, meter by meter.โ€

Due to global heating the Athabasca glacier has, in the last 125 years, retreated 1.5 km and lost half its volume. According to the latest estimates, itโ€™s currently withdrawing 5 metres every year.

Thunberg filming with the BBC in Glacier National Park, October 2019. Photo: Greta Thunberg

I was instructed to wear every piece of warm clothing that I have, since Katabatic winds โ€“ winds that form over glaciers โ€“ can be ruthless. And they werenโ€™t exaggerating. Once we step onto the ice it gets almost impossible to move forward, let alone to stand up straight. Thereโ€™s a heavy snowfall passing by, reminding us that the full force of the long Canadian winter is about to arrive any day now.

We struggle on in our borrowed boots, using ski poles to support our balance and weight. When we reach a place John considers good enough, he stops, takes off his backpack and starts unpacking his gear. He takes measurements while explaining the procedures step by step.

Then he starts chipping into the ice. He breaks off a piece and gives it to me.

โ€œIf you look carefully, you see itโ€™s full of small black dots. Thatโ€™s soot,โ€ he says.

Where does the soot come from?, I ask.

โ€œItโ€™s from the wildfires that burn here every year. The woods lose a lot of their resilience to the fires as there are so many dead trees all over the forest that become like firewood.โ€

I realise heโ€™s referring to the trees I saw yesterday.

โ€œWhen thereโ€™s this much soot then the entire glacier turns grey,โ€ he continues. โ€œAnd since a dark surface absorbs more heat than a white one, it means the glacier will melt even faster. Itโ€™s a feedback loop. A part of a chain reaction.โ€

I ask whether this glacier can be saved or not. He shakes his head.

โ€œNo, this one has already passed its tipping point and thereโ€™s nothing we can do. We estimate that it โ€“ along with countless other glaciers โ€“ will be gone completely within this century. The worldโ€™s glaciers are called the third polar ice cap. Imagine all the people that depend on these glaciers as their source of drinking water. And as if that wasnโ€™t enough, we have now gotten used to โ€“ and built our infrastructure around a very high water flow, since the melting process obviously has been way higher than it normally is. That will make it even harder for us to adjust when it starts to run dry.โ€

How many people are relying on the glaciers in this area for their drinking water, I ask.

โ€œThe entire western North America,โ€ he replies. โ€œBut the same process is happening all over the world. The Andes, The Alps. And above all in Asia, where up to 2 billion people depend on the natural melting process of the glaciers in Himalaya for their very survival.โ€

So, in short: the temperature increases, the damaging mountain pine beetle survives the winter and dramatically increases in population. The trees die and turn into wildfire fuel which intensifies the wildfires even further. The soot from those fires makes the surface of the glaciers turn darker and the melting process speeds up even faster.

This is a textbook example of a reinforcing chain reaction, which in itself is just a small part of a much larger holistic pattern connected to our emissions of greenhouse gases.

There are countless other tipping points and chain reactions. Some have not yet happened. And some are very much a reality already today. Such as the release of methane due to thawing permafrost or other phenomena linked to deforestation, dying coral reefs, weakening or changing ocean currents, algae growing on the Antarctic ice, increasing ocean temperatures, changes in monsoon patterns and so on.

Another overlooked factor is the already built in additional warming hidden by life threatening air pollution, this means that once we stop burning fossil fuels we can expect to see an already locked in warming, perhaps as high as 0.5-1.1ยฐC.

Itโ€™s all part of an infinite chain of events that constantly trigger and create new events. And new events. And new events. There just doesnโ€™t seem to be an end.

Chapter 7: Paradise

The wall is completely covered by posters. Each one contains a photo of an animal. Dogs, cats, bunnies. On each and every one there is a big headline that spells out the word MISSING. A handful has FOUND handwritten across the picture, but the vast majority remain MISSING.

The wall belongs to the local primary school in the town of Paradise, California. On Nov. 8, 2018 Paradise was almost completely destroyed by a devastating wildfire. The pictures on the school wall represent all the pets that went missing in the fire. This wall became a place where the owners collectively displayed their last hope of finding their pets alive. But, needless to say, most of the animals remain MISSING.

The fire in Paradise destroyed almost 19,000 buildings. 85 people lost their lives, if you exclude other causes of death after the fire. Before the fire 27, 000 people lived in Paradise. Today that number is down to around 2000. The town became a symbol of how climate breakdown is affecting us in the global north already today.

California has always had a natural fire season, just like Australia, Brazil and many other places. But over recent years that season has grown considerably longer and the fires have become more frequent and devastating. Higher temperatures, less rainfall and stronger winds are some of the changing factors that together make up for a deadly combination when it comes to wildfires.

Walking around in Paradise is almost like being in a ghost town. Iโ€™m here with the BBC to talk to one of the survivors of the 2018 fire. He guides us around the area that used to be his neighborhood. He points at empty spaces and tells us what used to be there. Houses and gardens in the lush, green outskirts of town.

โ€œThat was a car,โ€ he says and points to a lump of metal, lying on a burnt out driveway. The temperature in the fire sometimes got so high that cars started to melt. Suddenly he stops.

โ€œThis used to be my house.โ€ He looks at an open field as if there still was a house standing there. Itโ€™s almost as if heโ€™s hallucinating, since all that is left is a mailbox and the remains of power lines and sewage pipes, sticking out of the red soil.

The fact that the climate crisis is already affecting people today is hardly something new. Even though it would sometimes seem like it, judging by the ongoing discourse.

We often hear that we need to act for the sake of our children. That the future living conditions will get significantly worsened unless we act now. And that is of course true. But it seems like we keep forgetting that large numbers of people around the world are dying already today. And when I say that Iโ€™m not primarily talking about in places like California.

The ones who are and will be hit the hardest are the same as in most other crises. The poorest and the most vulnerable. Those who are already suffering from other injustices. Namely, people in developing countries, and above all women and children. Since they are the ones with the least resources, living in the most vulnerable parts of the global society.


The UN predicts that by the year 2050 there will be up to 1 billion climate refugees in the world. I wonder, what will it take for us to start facing these issues and begin to ask the uncomfortable questions?

In Sweden we live our lives as if we had 4.2 planet earths. Our annual carbon footprint is approximately 11 tonnes of CO2 per person, if we include consumption. That can be compared to Indiaโ€™s 1.7 tonnes per capita. Or Kenyas 0.3 tonnes.

On average the CO2 emissions from one single Swede annually is the equivalent of 110 people from Mali in West Africa. So if there is any truth to the claim โ€“ popular in Western societies โ€“ that quote โ€there are too many people in the worldโ€ then wouldnโ€™t that only refer to ourselves, living extremely high carbon lifestyles in the global north? And not the vast majority of the global population who are already living within the planetary boundaries.

But my experience from all such arguments is that they are only used to seek further excuses to go on living the unsustainable life that we consider to be our right.

The climate and sustainability crisis is not a fair crisis. The ones whoโ€™ll be hit hardest from its consequences are often the ones who have done the least to cause the problem in the first place.

The global aspect of equity and climate justice make up the very heart of the Paris Agreement. Developed countries have signed up to lead the way.

And this is so that people in developing countries can have a chance to raise their living standards and to build some of the infrastructure that we in the industrialized world already have. Such as roads, hospitals, schools, electricity, sewage systems and clean drinking water.

After our visit to Paradise we get back in the car and head towards the coast. We have been offered a stay for the night in a small house in a vineyard. But suddenly the phone rings and we find out that the entire vineyard has burnt to the ground in the wildfires currently raging through the California wine districts.

We drive on towards San Francisco. As the evening falls the night sky turns red and you can feel the smoke from the fires in your nose.

Chapter 8: Media

โ€œWait, let me just record the interview.โ€

The journalist grabs his iPhone out of the pocket of his way-too-thin coat. It is a cloudy, freezing day on Mynttorget in the old town of central Stockholm. But just like any other Friday a few dozen others and I have gathered here to stand outside and protest in front of the Swedish parliament. It does get a bit chilly standing there for 7 hours straight in a few windy degrees below zero.

He presses record and holds up the phone towards me.

โ€œSo, why are you striking?โ€ he asks.

Iโ€™m striking for us to take the climate crisis seriously and treat it like a crisis.

โ€œYes, but what do you want the politicians to do?โ€

I want them to listen to and act on the science, do what they have promised to do in the Paris Agreement and treat the crisis like a crisis.

I can tell that I havenโ€™t given him the answers he wanted.

โ€œYes, but what specifically?โ€

When I then start talking about carbon budgets he gives up and interrupts. He knows very well he wonโ€™t be able to use anything of what Iโ€™m now saying in his article. People want something simple and concrete, and they want me to be naive, angry, childish and emotional. That is the story that sells and creates the most clicks.

โ€œBut uh,โ€ he continues, โ€œhow are we going to solve this climate issue?โ€

Just the fact that this question is asked to me โ€“ a teenager โ€“ over and over is absurd. But not as absurd as the fact that the climate- and ecological emergency is being reduced to a โ€œproblemโ€ that needs to be โ€œfixedโ€. That it is seen as an โ€œimportant topicโ€ among other โ€œimportant topicsโ€.

Thunberg speaks to activists during a climate strike before the COP25 summit, in Madrid, December 2019. Evgenia Arbugaeva for TIME

Of course I donโ€™t know how we are going to solve the climate crisis. The fact is that no one knows. There is no magic invention or political plan that will solve everything. Because how do you solve a crisis? How do you solve a war? How do you solve a pandemic without a vaccine?

The only way is to treat the climate crisis like you would treat any other crisis. To come together, gather all the experts, put other things aside and adapt to the new reality. To act as quickly and strongly as the situation allows.

If for instance thereโ€™s no vaccine available for a disease you invest all possible resources into developing one as soon as possible, while at the same time taking all other possible measures as well. In a crisis you act even if you donโ€™t know exactly how you are going to solve the problem. In a crisis thereโ€™s no time to wait for specific answers and details. Because the answers have to be found along the way. In a crisis you need to put all cards on the table and think long term and holistically. The climate crisis doesnโ€™t have a vaccine. We have to admit that we donโ€™t know how we are going to solve it. Because if we would have known then it wouldnโ€™t have been a crisis in the first place.

There are many who claim that people understand but repress the full meaning of the climate crisis, because the message is too depressing and difficult to handle. That would mean that we continue to do what we do, despite being fully aware of the devastating consequences of our actions. But that I refuse to believe, since this would mean that we humans are evil.

My experience however is that people understand much less about the climate crisis than youโ€™d think. If thereโ€™s anything Iโ€™ve learnt from traveling around the world it is that the level of knowledge and awareness is close to nonexistent.

Iโ€™ve met many of the most powerful people in the world. And even among them pretty much everyone lacks even some of the most basic knowledge. So if people are not aware, who is guilty for the message not getting through?

The reporter on Mynttorget is running out of time, he knows his phoneโ€™s battery wonโ€™t last much longer in the cold.

โ€œBut who really is Greta?โ€ he asks. โ€œI think people want to know Greta.โ€

Iโ€™m not important, I answer. This has got nothing to do with me. Iโ€™m completely uninteresting. Iโ€™m not doing this because I want to become famous or popular or get followers on social media.

โ€œIโ€™m doing this simply because no one else is doing anything.โ€

Chapter 9: Crossing the Atlantic

Itโ€™s six oโ€™clock in the morning on Nov. 13, 2019. The TV monitors in the hotel lobby in Hampton, Virginia are showing weather warnings on repeat. Giant storm patterns are raging along the entire North American east coast, from Florida to Nova Scotia.

We step inside the car with the tiny luggage weโ€™ve got left. Itโ€™s pitch black outside and the car is still freezing. Rob Liddell, a documentarian with the BBC, and sailor Nikki Henderson are sitting in the back. Nikki scrolls through the latest weather updates on her phone. Rob has got the camera on his shoulder and is looking at us through the lens.

Itโ€™s dead silent inside the car. The only thing you hear is Nikki sighing and moaning over and over again. After what feels like an eternity she shakes her head, puts the phone down and goes โ€œwow guys, weโ€™re in for a rough rideโ€.

โ€œBut weโ€™re still going, right?โ€ my dad asks, a bit worried.

โ€œOf course,โ€ she says.

Rob tries to ask me questions to get some kind of interview going, but Iโ€™m not really in the right mood.

One hour later we cast off from the dock. We clear the harbor entrance heading for Chesapeake Bay and wave goodbye to all the people and TV crews who have gathered on the surrounding docks. Thereโ€™s a strong wind coming from Northwest. On deck the freezing temperatures of last night have turned all puddles into thick layers of ice. Itโ€™s snowing. We set sail and head for the open sea. Towards the lighthouse. Towards the ocean. Towards Europe. Towards Portugal. Towards Stockholm Central Station.

Thunberg departs the U.S. on the catamaran La Vagabonde as she sets sail towards Portugal in Hampton, Virginia, on November 13, 2019. Eva Oโ€™Leary for TIME

You do not sail across the North Atlantic ocean in November. At the end of September the storms come, and then the season closes until spring. Of course I had not planned for it to be like this. But the UN COP25 summit, where I was headed, was suddenly moved from Santiago to Madrid, meaning I had traveled halfway across the globe in the wrong direction. I had to find a solution.

I consider every possible option. Zeppelin airships, solar powered airplane and even sailing across the Pacific Ocean and then taking the Trans Siberian railway home. The most likely outcome however is to stay somewhere in North America for the winter.

Hundreds of people get in touch and want to help, but very few actually have something concrete to offer. The French and Spanish governments reach out and assure that they are going to help me find a way. However it is very unclear how they will do that.

Two Nordic airlines email and offer to arrange a flight using โ€œ50% sustainable fuel and then use the remaining 50% on another flight so that in total it becomes 100% fossil freeโ€. As if biofuels were sustainable.

If I wouldnโ€™t have been who I am I would probably have hitched a ride on a cargo ship, since they โ€“ unlike airplanes and cruise ships โ€“ donโ€™t depend on paying passengers.

But everything I do and say gets altered and turned upside down which leads to mockery, conspiracy theories and organised hate campaigns. Which in turn leads to death threats toward me and my family. And that build up of hate and threat is much riskier than all the storms in the world.

Then suddenly one night in a hotel room in Savannah, Georgia, the phone beeps. It is Riley and Eleyna, a couple of young Australian YouTubers who are reaching out. Theyโ€™re living on their catamaran with their one year-old son Lenny and are sailing around in the world, with no planned route. They offer to take us to Europe.

On the boat, we steer south so that in a certain amount of time we will have put ourselves in a strategically safe position away from a storm, so that we later can safely get to another position to avoid the next big storm. And then the next one, and the next one, and the next one. The low pressure systems sweeping over the North Atlantic right now are enormous. During the days we have gusts reaching up to 60 knots, and some nights the electric storms are so immense that you can see sparks in the water. We store all electronic devices in the oven to avoid them getting destroyed by lightning.

We are completely in the hands of the meteorologists helping us, sending weather updates and recommendations a few times a day. Weโ€™re very lucky to also have Nikki, a professional sailor, onboard. One hundred nautical miles in the wrong position can be the difference between life and death this time of year with this boat. You simply have to blindly trust data and the experts.

Me, my dad, Nikki, Elayna, Riley and Lenny are alone in the middle of the Atlantic Ocean. We are at the mercy of nature and have to act accordingly. We need to be able to take care of ourselves if something goes wrong.

If you are one week away from the nearest harbour you do not take any unnecessary risks. You donโ€™t for instance start a fire on deck if you feel cold, you donโ€™t throw away limited provisions of food or necessary equipment out in the ocean. You keep a constant watchful eye on the horizon and you donโ€™t allow yourself to get struck by hubris. Onboard we are guided by common sense, the same common sense that should exist everywhere.

We are a civilisation isolated in the middle of the universe. Space is our ocean and the planet is our boat. Our one and only boat.


Chapter 10: Greenwashing

So what should we do to avoid a climate disaster beyond human control?

That is the question of our time. It is being asked by people all across the political spectrum from all over the world.

But what if the question to a great extent has been phrased the wrong way? What if it should rather be โ€œwhat should we stop doing to avoid a climate disasterโ€?

This year โ€“ 2020 โ€“ the emission curve must be bent steeply downwards if we are to still have even a small chance of achieving the goals world leaders have agreed to. And then itโ€™s of course not going to be enough with a temporary and coincidental reduction of greenhouse gas emissions where the purpose has been to stop a pandemic.

A common misconception about the climate crisis is that people think we need to reduce our emissions. But the fact is that if we are to keep the promise of the Paris Agreement, a reduction wonโ€™t be enough. We then need to reach a full stop of emissions within a couple of decades, and then quickly move on to negative figures.

There are generally three ways of reducing emissions โ€“ apart from the most obvious, to replace current fossil energy with renewables, such as solar and wind.

Number one is technical solutions. Techniques where you capture and store CO2 at the emitting source or directly out of the air. The problem here however is that the emissions need to drastically reduce now, and these techniques wonโ€™t exist at even close to scale in the foreseeable future. These plants are still prototypes. Believe me, Iโ€™ve myself visited two of the leading facilities in the world.

The second alternative is to use natureโ€™s own ability to absorb and store carbon, which today often gets mistaken for only planting trees. Despite the fact that the most efficient way most often is to just leave the forests and natural habitats be in the first place.

A forest area the size of a football field is being cut down every second, according to Global Forest Watch. That is every second of every hour of every day. No tree planting in the world could compensate for that. And even if we miraculously decided to shut down the entire forestry industry and use all the available space in the world to plant trees, that still would only compensate for a few yearsโ€™ emissions at current rates.

The third option is the only method that is available at scale already today. And that is to simply stop doing certain things. But it is also the alternative which people seem to find the most unrealistic. Just the thought of us being in a crisis that we cannot buy, build or invest our way out of seems to create some kind of collective mental short circuit.

Then thereโ€™s of course a fourth way of doing it. And this is the procedure that undoubtedly has been the most successful one so far, when it comes to reducing emissions. And it is so-called โ€œcreative accountingโ€. To simply refrain from reporting the emissions, or move them somewhere else. To systematically sweep things under the carpet, lie, and blame someone else.

My own country Sweden is a textbook example. In our case this strategy means that over half our emissions simply donโ€™t exist on paper.

Greta Thunberg addresses supporters and journalists upon her arrival in Santo Amaro Recreation dock on December 03, 2019 in Lisbon, Portugal. Evgenia Arbugaeva for TIME

Year after year people in power are allowed to appear in the media unchallenged and claim that Swedenโ€™s emissions of greenhouse gases have decreased 20-30% since 1990. But the truth is that they havenโ€™t decreased at all, if you include consumption and international aviation and shipping. And obviously the statistics will look much better if you simply choose not to count everything.

But this is not unique to Sweden. The same approach is being used by pretty much everyone in the richer part of the world. Whether it being the EU, individual countries, states, cities or companies.

We have simply moved our factories to different parts of the world where the labour is cheaper โ€“ and by doing so we also moved a significant part of our emissions overseas. And of course this is a very convenient solution for the global north, but since the biosphere doesnโ€™t care about neither borders nor empty words, it doesnโ€™t work as well in reality.

But the real problem is that when it comes to the climate- and ecological emergency the people in power can today say basically whatever they want. They are practically guaranteed to not receive any follow up questions.

The issue of nuclear power is still for example allowed to dominate the entire climate debate, even though science has concluded that it can โ€“ at best โ€“ only be a very risky, expensive and small part of a much larger holistic solution.

You can claim that we can achieve impossible results through so-called green investments, without having to explain how it will be done, or what the term โ€œgreenโ€ even means. Words like green, sustainable, โ€™net zeroโ€™, โ€˜environmentally friendlyโ€™, organic, โ€˜climate neutralโ€™ and โ€˜fossil freeโ€™ are today so misused and watered down that they have pretty much lost all their meaning. They can imply everything from deforestation to aviation, meat- and car industries.

And basically because the general level of public awareness is so low you can still get away with anything. No one is held accountable. Itโ€™s like a game. Whoever is best at packaging and selling their message wins. And since the truth is uncomfortable, unpopular and unprofitable, the truth doesnโ€™t stand much of a chance.

Moral, truth, long term- and holistic thinking seem to mean nothing to us. The emperors are naked. Every single one. It turns out our whole society is just one big nudist party.

Chapter 11: Corona pandemic

Last year when I visited Davos I slept in a tent in 18ยฐ below zero. This year the organisers said that for security reasons I had to stay in a hotel.

The night before the conference starts I catch the flu. So it was quite a relief that I wasnโ€™t sleeping in a tent. I have to cancel most scheduled events, which is something I actually donโ€™t mind at all, since I find social gatherings and meetings that donโ€™t lead anywhere mostly just being a waste of time.

So my stay is quite relaxing, but today Iโ€™m supposed to drag myself out the door for a meeting with the president of Switzerland. After that Iโ€™m going to go public with my plans about traveling to China. Iโ€™ve just received the official invitation to address the World Economic Forum conference which will most likely be held in Shenzhen, China sometime in the beginning of June. Visiting China is something Iโ€™ve wanted to do for a long time, and now itโ€™s finally about to happen, that is, if the Chinese government will let me inside the country.

But just as Iโ€™m about to walk out the door the Swiss president cancels, as she had to immediately go back to Zรผrich to attend an emergency meeting. Apparently developments around the new virus discovered in China are causing grave concern.

That was my first introduction to the coronavirus crisis. I immediately put my plans of visiting China on hold. It seemed to become less and less possible to travel there sometime this spring. Instead I start planning to follow up on some other invitations, to take the Trans Siberian railway via Vladivostok to South Korea and Japan. But as the situation escalates I of course have to abandon these plans as well.

Thunberg arrives in Madrid for the last U.N. climate summit before a crucial deadline in 2020. Evgenia Arbugaeva for TIME

So I use the upcoming weeks to travel around in Europe, continuing to work on the documentary together with the BBC. We visit Jokkmokk, London, Yorkshire, Zรผrich and the European parliament. I strike in Hamburg, Bristol and Brussels. Itโ€™s the beginning of March 2020 and the world is just about to be turned completely upside down. This weekend there are supposed to be big climate strikes in France. But right here a tipping point is passed. What was unquestionable the week before has now suddenly become unthinkable.

In the Fridays For Future movement we decide to cancel everything, without hesitation. People are dying. Many are losing their family members, loved ones as well as their economic stability. The consequences of this pandemic are catastrophic. A crisis is a crisis, and in a crisis we all have to take a few steps back and act for the greater good of each other and our society. In a crisis you adapt and change your behaviour. And indeed, this is what the world does, at record speed.

So what was it that made these global structural changes possible in just a matter of hours?

Was it hope and inspiration that made us act so quickly during the corona pandemic? Something that most communication experts and news editors have claimed to be the only way forward to create change. Or was it perhaps something else?

Thereโ€™s nothing positive about the corona crisis from a climate perspective. The changes made in our daily lives due to COVID-19 have extremely little similarity with the action needed for the climate.

The corona tragedy of course has no long term positive effects on the climate, apart from one thing only: namely the insight into how you should perceive and treat an emergency. Because during the corona crisis we suddenly act with necessary force.

International emergency meetings take place on a daily basis. Astronomical financial bailouts magically appear out of nowhere. Canceled events and tough restrictions make people change their behaviour and approach overnight.

The media completely transitions, puts other things on hold and almost exclusively reports about COVID-19, with daily press conferences and live coverage 24/7. All parts of society come together and politicians put their different views aside and cooperate for the greater good of everyone. Well โ€“ maybe not everyone and everywhere.

But broadly speaking, people in power from politics, business and finance are suddenly saying that they will do whatever it takes since โ€œyou can not put a price on a human lifeโ€.

Those words and this treatment of the crisis opens up a whole new dimension. Because you see, every year at least 7 million people die from illnesses related to air pollution, according to the WHO. Those are apparently people whose lives we can put a price on. Since they die from the wrong causes, and in the wrong parts of the world.

During the corona pandemic policy makers repeat that we have to โ€œlisten to the science and the expertsโ€. Well, according to the worldโ€™s leading scientists and experts on biodiversity, the pandemic is likely to be followed by deadlier and more destructive diseases unless we halt the ceaseless destruction of natural habitats.

But these are not the scientists and experts they are referring to. Because long term sustainability doesnโ€™t fit inside todayโ€™s economic and political systems.

Chapter 12: Hope

In the aftermath of the corona crisis there are many who claim that we need to use this as an opportunity. That when we restart the economy we must adopt a so-called โ€œgreen recovery planโ€. And of course itโ€™s incredibly important that we invest our assets in sustainable projects, renewable energy, technical solutions and research. But we must not for one second believe that it will be even close to what is actually required. Or for that matter that the so called targets set out today would be ambitious enough.

If all countries were to actually go through with the emission reductions they have set as goals, we would still be heading for a catastrophic global temperature rise of at least 3-4 degrees. The people in power today have thus practically already given up on the possibility of handing over a decent future for coming generations. Given up without even trying.

It sounds terrible, I know. But in reality it is actually even worse. Because even if they want to act in line with what is needed โ€“ which actually sometimes is the case โ€“ they canโ€™t. And that is because we are stuck in already written contracts and business agreements.

Itโ€™s just simple math.

The United Nations Production Gap Report shows that the worldโ€™s planned fossil fuel production alone by the year 2030 accounts for 120% more than what would be consistent with the 1.5ยฐC target. It just doesnโ€™t add up.

So if we are to avoid a climate catastrophe we have to make it possible to tear up contracts and abandon existing deals and agreements, on a scale we canโ€™t even begin to imagine today.

And that alone requires a whole new way of thinking. Since those type of actions are not politically, economically or legally possible today. The climate- and ecological crisis can not be solved within todayโ€™s political and economic systems. That is no longer an opinion. Thatโ€™s a fact.

I understand that all of this sounds uncomfortable and depressing. And I fully get why you as a politician or news editor choose to look away. But you must also realise that for us who actually have to live with the consequences for the rest of our lives, thatโ€™s a luxury that we canโ€™t afford.

Recently a new scientific report was published by scientists from Uppsala University and the Tyndall Centre in the UK. It shows that if rich countries like Sweden and the UK are to fulfill their commitments to the Paris Agreementโ€™s well-below 2ยฐC target they need to reduce their total national emissions of CO2 by 12-15% every year, starting now.

Of course thereโ€™s no โ€œgreen recovery planโ€ or โ€œdealโ€ in the world that alone would be able to achieve such emission cuts. And thatโ€™s why the whole โ€œgreen dealโ€ debate ironically risks doing more harm than good, as it sends a signal that the changes needed are possible within todayโ€™s societies. As if we could somehow solve a crisis without treating it like a crisis. A lot may have happened in the last two years, but the changes and level of awareness required are still nowhere in sight.

Things may look dark and hopeless, but Iโ€™m telling you there is hope. And that hope comes from the people, from democracy, from you. From the people who more and more themselves are starting to realize the absurdity of the situation. The hope does not come from politics, business or finance. And thatโ€™s not because politicians or businesspeople are evil. But because what is needed right now simply seems to be too uncomfortable, unpopular and unprofitable.

Public opinion is what runs the free world, and the public opinion necessary is today nonexisting, the level of knowledge is too low.

But there are signs of change, of awakening. Just take the metoo movement, blacklivesmatter or the schoolstrike movement for instance. Itโ€™s all interconnected. We have passed a social tipping point, we can no longer look away from what our society has been ignoring for so long. Whether it is sustainability, equality, or justice.

From a sustainability point of view all political and economic systems have failed. But humanity has not yet failed. The climate and ecological emergency is not primarily a political crisis. It is an existential crisis, completely based on scientific facts.

The evidence is there. The numbers are there. We cannot get away from that fact. Nature doesnโ€™t bargain and you cannot compromise with the laws of physics. And either we accept and understand the reality as it is, or we donโ€™t. Either we go on as a civilisation or we donโ€™t.

Doing our best is no longer good enough. We must now do the seemingly impossible. And that is up to you and me. Because no one else will do it for us.

Young supporters of Greta Thunberg await her arrival in Santo Amaro Recreation dock on December 03, 2019 in Lisbon, Portugal. Evgenia Arbugaeva for TIME
 
Enter your email address below to subscribe to our newsletter
Subscribe
Subscribe To Bergensia's Newsletter
Be the first to get latest updates and exclusive content straight to your email inbox.
Subscribe
Give it a try, you can unsubscribe anytime.
Send this to a friend